<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01058nam a2200133   4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The New Times</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Why Africa Must Fight Illicit Financial Flows</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rwanda</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">The New Times</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The article details Rwanda's efforts to tackle the problem of tax avoidance among some multinational corporations are part of a well understood malady affecting the region and Africa at large. Illicit Financial Flows (IFFs) generally involve hiding wealth from a country's tax authorities, and may involve the transfer of money earned through illegal activities such as corruption, as well as transactions involving contraband goods and criminal activities. It is for this reason it should be of interest see what turns up from the audit Rwanda has just commissioned to look into recent merger and acquisition deals involving some foreign companies in the country.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion, Rwanda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/Why Africa Must Fight Illicit Financial Flows.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">941</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">941</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
