<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01153nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Stiglizt, J. E and Pieth, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Overcoming the Shadow Economy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">German </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES)</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">25p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Policy Analysis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This 25-page report, Overcoming the Shadow Economy, argues that, as economic leaders, the U.S. and the European Union have an obligation to force financial centers to comply with global transparency standards. The U.S. and EU have shown they have the tools to stem the flow of dirty money in the fight against terrorism, but have failed to use these same anti-money-laundering tools as forcefully in the fight against financial corruption and tax dodging, the report says. This new report is an outgrowth of the pair&#x2019;s initial work on a study committee appointed by the Panamanian government in response to a series of news stories by ICIJ and more than 100 media partners.	</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tax Evasion and Avoidance, Corruption, Transparency, Money Laundering</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/Overcoming_the_shadow_Economy.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">854</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">854</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
