<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01048nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">978-971-9657-08-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tomlinson, B.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Technical Cooperation as an Aid Modality: Demand-Led or Donor-Driven?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abridged Edition</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Philippines</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IBON International</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">98p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This 2016 ROA Report comprised of 23 contributors, provides analyses relating to the performance of aid donors in the provision of technical assistance from a unique perspective of civil society, in both donor and  recipient developing countries, with a focus on poverty reduction. They explored the role of technical assistance in bilateral donors&#x2019; and multilateral development banks&#x2019; aid, technical cooperation for trade and infrastructure development, technical cooperation and tied aid, and South-South experience in technical cooperation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Poverty, Development, Capital Flows, Corruption, Tax Evasion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/Abridged-ROA-Report-2016.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">841</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">841</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
