<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01139nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Knobel, A. and Meinzer, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Drilling Down To The Real Owners &#x2013; Part 1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">United Kingdom</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Tax Justice Network</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This report Drilling down to the real owners first part by the Tax Justice Network analyses focuses on just two, though crucial flaws: high thresholds in the definition of BO (&#x201C;more than 25% of ownership&#x201D;), and an escape route to avoid identifying the BO by registering a senior manager instead (by allowing a misinterpretation of situations where &#x201C;no person is identified as BO&#x201D;). The likely result of these flaws is the widespread abuse of nominee directors and shareholders that are &#x201C;mistakenly&#x201D; recorded as BOs, or the proliferation of entities without a BO. If this is not addressed, both FATF and EU regulations would help protect the veil of secrecy offered by the offshore legal entities exposed by Panama Papers.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Banking Secrecy, Tax, Corruption </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/TJN2016_BO-EUAMLD-FATF-Part1 (1).pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">762</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">762</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
