<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Illicit Flows in the Poorest of Places</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Cardamone, T.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Washington, DC</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Global Financial Integrity</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2015</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>3p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Over the past year or so, Global Financial Integrity has begun to hear—in various venues and by various people—the warning to audiences that they shouldn’t “focus on the big number.” A trillion dollars is a global number, these observers say, and can’t be used to assess the impact at the country level. Or, they contend, the trillion dollars in IFFs is from a cluster of emerging market countries and therefore is skewed to make it look as though all developing countries have huge problems when really only a few do. GFI decided to go back to the data to see if the criticisms were accurate.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Capital Outflow, Poverty</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="uri">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/illicit_flows_in_the_poorest_of_places.pdf</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/illicit_flows_in_the_poorest_of_places.pdf</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo/>
</mods>
