<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01113nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">978-1-78077-973-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Weyzig, F</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Still Broken: Governments must do more to fix the International Corporate Tax System</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Joint  Agency Briefing Note</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Oxfam GB for Tax Justice Network, Global Alliance for Tax Justice, PSI and Oxfam International</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">12p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The report  emphasises the need for  governments to do more to fix the international corporate tax system .Even though 
some meaningful actions are being taken , they have left the fundamentals of a broken tax system intact and failed to curb tax competition and harmful tax practices. Considering the enormous losses that countries around the world incur, it is alarming that the G20 seems fairly satisfied with the current agenda. Governments and citizens of G20 countries should wake up, face the facts and take additional action immediately.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tax Evasion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/Briefing_Summary_Corporate_Tax_Gap_10Nov2015.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">460</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">460</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
