<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00919nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Whitehead ,Eleanor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kenya: want a shell company? No question</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">London</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Financial Times</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2013.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The article talks of Kenya being the easiest place in the world to set up an untraceable shell company. East Africa&#x2019;s biggest economy tops a list of places in which incorporation agents are least likely to ask questions about the ownership of shell companies &#x2013; groups which serve as a vehicle for business transactions, without active operations or meaningful assets. Those corporations have legitimate uses, but when set up anonymously can serve as vehicles for money laundering and tax evasion. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MONEY LAUNDERING, TAX EVASION, TAX HAVEN, TRANSPARENCY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/kenya_want_a_shell_company__no_question.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">401</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">401</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
