<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01088nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Daily News</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Illicit transactions cost Zim $2,6bn</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Harare</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Daily News</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2015.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1p</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The article tackles IFFs in Zimbabwe ,the major players and the major causes.The article is based on  a study by Global Financial Integrity (GFI).  Zimbabwe is said to have lost approximately $2,6 billion in the nine years to 2012 due to IFFs. Zimbabwe recorded alarming imports over-invoicing and under-invoicing during the period. While the years 2003, 2008, 2011 and 2012 recorded no illicit financial flows, GFI says the year 2004 saw Zimbabwe recording $306 million in illicit financial flows (both inflows and outflows), which increased to $354 million in 2005, and further to $1,7 billion in 2006, before declining to $97 million in 2007.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MISPRICING MISINVOICING BANKING SECRECY BALANCE OF PAYMENTS CAPITAL OUTFLOW MISPRICING UNDERPRICING</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff//illicit_transactions_cost_zim_$2,6bn.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">NA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">335</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">335</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
