<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01104nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pak, Simon. J</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lost billions-Transfer Pricing in the Extractive Industries</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Norway</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Publish What You Pay Norway</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2012.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">20p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Over 110 billion US dollars seems to have disappeared in over and under pricing on import of crude oil in the European Union and the USA between 2000 and 2010. How did that happen? Transfer pricing is one of the most usual techniques that extractive industries can use to transfer profits from the source country and to the company itself. Today, over 60% of world trade is taking place within transnational companies, such as the extractive industries. The OECD suggests that companies should keep arm's length prices; as if they traded with a company outside the company structure itself. But do they do this? And does this guiding principle work?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mispricing ,Money laundering ,Capital flight</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/lost_billions_transfer_pricing_in_the_extractive_industries.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">265</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">265</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
