<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01089nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Letete, E.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Illicit Financial Flows and Political Institutions in Kenya</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">C&#xF4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">African Development Bank Group</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2017</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">32p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Working Paper Series No. 275</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This paper, published by African Development Bank Group explores a political economy perspective as an alternative explanation to the illicit financial outflows in Kenya. Evidence from the institutional indices found that increased arbitrary executive powers are positively associated with illicit financial outflows. That is, in the Kenyan context, prevailing weaknesses in the political institutions do matter for illicit financial flows (rent extraction). This finding is robust to the constraints on the executive from Polity IV Indicators as an alternative indicator of institutions.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Illicit Wealth</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sarr, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">iffoadatabase.trustafrica.org/iff/Illicit_Financial_Flows_and_Political_Institutions_in_Kenya__.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">1057</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1057</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
